# Do some basic tests first, then test more fine-tuned/aggressively via snapshots test_that("Base model works, female", { expect_equal( estimate_risk_partial(quiet = TRUE), list( risk_est_10yr = dplyr::tibble( total_cvd = 0.147, ascvd = 0.092, heart_failure = 0.081, chd = 0.044, stroke = 0.054, model = "base", over_years = 10, input_problems = NA_character_ ), risk_est_30yr = dplyr::tibble( total_cvd = 0.53, ascvd = 0.354, heart_failure = 0.39, chd = 0.198, stroke = 0.221, model = "base", over_years = 30, input_problems = NA_character_ ) ) ) }) test_that("HbA1c model works, female", { expect_equal( estimate_risk_partial(hba1c = 9.2, quiet = TRUE), list( risk_est_10yr = dplyr::tibble( total_cvd = 0.165, ascvd = 0.103, heart_failure = 0.107, chd = 0.055, stroke = 0.053, model = "hba1c", over_years = 10, input_problems = NA_character_ ), risk_est_30yr = dplyr::tibble( total_cvd = 0.541, ascvd = 0.356, heart_failure = 0.449, chd = 0.219, stroke = 0.2, model = "hba1c", over_years = 30, input_problems = NA_character_ ) ) ) }) test_that("UACR model works, female", { expect_equal( estimate_risk_partial(uacr = 92, quiet = TRUE), list( risk_est_10yr = dplyr::tibble( total_cvd = 0.181, ascvd = 0.111, heart_failure = 0.105, chd = 0.055, stroke = 0.065, model = "uacr", over_years = 10, input_problems = NA_character_ ), risk_est_30yr = dplyr::tibble( total_cvd = 0.565, ascvd = 0.381, heart_failure = 0.437, chd = 0.22, stroke = 0.241, model = "uacr", over_years = 30, input_problems = NA_character_ ) ) ) }) test_that("SDI model works, female", { expect_equal( estimate_risk_partial(zip = "14738", quiet = TRUE), list( risk_est_10yr = dplyr::tibble( total_cvd = 0.127, ascvd = 0.08, heart_failure = 0.07, chd = 0.038, stroke = 0.047, model = "sdi", over_years = 10, input_problems = NA_character_ ), risk_est_30yr = dplyr::tibble( total_cvd = 0.485, ascvd = 0.322, heart_failure = 0.358, chd = 0.179, stroke = 0.202, model = "sdi", over_years = 30, input_problems = NA_character_ ) ) ) }) test_that("Full model works, female", { expect_equal( estimate_risk_partial(hba1c = 9.2, uacr = 92, zip = "14738", quiet = TRUE), list( risk_est_10yr = dplyr::tibble( total_cvd = 0.174, ascvd = 0.105, heart_failure = 0.114, chd = 0.056, stroke = 0.056, model = "full", over_years = 10, input_problems = NA_character_ ), risk_est_30yr = dplyr::tibble( total_cvd = 0.534, ascvd = 0.348, heart_failure = 0.443, chd = 0.213, stroke = 0.204, model = "full", over_years = 30, input_problems = NA_character_ ) ) ) }) test_that("Base model works, male", { expect_equal( estimate_risk_partial(sex = "male", quiet = TRUE), list( risk_est_10yr = dplyr::tibble( total_cvd = 0.163, ascvd = 0.102, heart_failure = 0.106, chd = 0.056, stroke = 0.052, model = "base", over_years = 10, input_problems = NA_character_ ), risk_est_30yr = dplyr::tibble( total_cvd = 0.514, ascvd = 0.349, heart_failure = 0.424, chd = 0.216, stroke = 0.197, model = "base", over_years = 30, input_problems = NA_character_ ) ) ) }) test_that("HbA1c model works, male", { expect_equal( estimate_risk_partial(sex = "male", hba1c = 9.2, quiet = TRUE), list( risk_est_10yr = dplyr::tibble( total_cvd = 0.187, ascvd = 0.112, heart_failure = 0.13, chd = 0.063, stroke = 0.056, model = "hba1c", over_years = 10, input_problems = NA_character_ ), risk_est_30yr = dplyr::tibble( total_cvd = 0.524, ascvd = 0.34, heart_failure = 0.457, chd = 0.211, stroke = 0.188, model = "hba1c", over_years = 30, input_problems = NA_character_ ) ) ) }) test_that("UACR model works, male", { expect_equal( estimate_risk_partial(sex = "male", uacr = 92, quiet = TRUE), list( risk_est_10yr = dplyr::tibble( total_cvd = 0.195, ascvd = 0.123, heart_failure = 0.13, chd = 0.066, stroke = 0.063, model = "uacr", over_years = 10, input_problems = NA_character_ ), risk_est_30yr = dplyr::tibble( total_cvd = 0.535, ascvd = 0.368, heart_failure = 0.448, chd = 0.227, stroke = 0.213, model = "uacr", over_years = 30, input_problems = NA_character_ ) ) ) }) test_that("SDI model works, male", { expect_equal( estimate_risk_partial(sex = "male", zip = "14738", quiet = TRUE), list( risk_est_10yr = dplyr::tibble( total_cvd = 0.143, ascvd = 0.088, heart_failure = 0.089, chd = 0.049, stroke = 0.043, model = "sdi", over_years = 10, input_problems = NA_character_ ), risk_est_30yr = dplyr::tibble( total_cvd = 0.48, ascvd = 0.317, heart_failure = 0.384, chd = 0.199, stroke = 0.171, model = "sdi", over_years = 30, input_problems = NA_character_ ) ) ) }) test_that("Full model works, male", { expect_equal( estimate_risk_partial(sex = "male", hba1c = 9.2, uacr = 92, zip = "14738", quiet = TRUE), list( risk_est_10yr = dplyr::tibble( total_cvd = 0.191, ascvd = 0.112, heart_failure = 0.131, chd = 0.068, stroke = 0.052, model = "full", over_years = 10, input_problems = NA_character_ ), risk_est_30yr = dplyr::tibble( total_cvd = 0.513, ascvd = 0.326, heart_failure = 0.438, chd = 0.216, stroke = 0.167, model = "full", over_years = 30, input_problems = NA_character_ ) ) ) }) test_that("Age validation works", { expect_snapshot(nested_lapply("age", 29, 80)) }) # Because helper fxs test both sexes (and don't accept `sex` as an arg), # need to test this input a bit differently test_that("Sex validation works", { check_equations_partial_sans_sex <- function(sex, quiet) { res <- estimate_risk( age = 50, sex = sex, sbp = 160, bp_tx = TRUE, total_c = 200, hdl_c = 45, statin = FALSE, dm = TRUE, smoking = FALSE, egfr = 90, bmi = 35, hba1c = NULL, uacr = NULL, zip = NULL, model = NULL, time = "both", chol_unit = "mg/dL", quiet = quiet ) list( res_10yr = res[["risk_est_10yr"]] |> dplyr::select(-input_problems), input_probs_10yr = res[["risk_est_10yr"]][["input_problems"]], res_30yr = res[["risk_est_30yr"]] |> dplyr::select(-input_problems), input_probs_10yr = res[["risk_est_30yr"]][["input_problems"]] ) } # Chatty version expect_snapshot( lapply( test_vals(), function(x) check_equations_partial_sans_sex(x, FALSE) ) ) # Quiet version expect_snapshot( lapply( test_vals(), function(x) check_equations_partial_sans_sex(x, TRUE) ) ) }) test_that("SBP validation works", { expect_snapshot(nested_lapply("sbp", 89, 181)) }) test_that("BP treatment validation works", { # Expect instance of testing 0 and FALSE (see `test_vals()`) # to yield (identical) results given those are valid inputs in this case expect_snapshot(nested_lapply("bp_tx")) }) test_that("Total cholesterol validation works", { expect_snapshot(nested_lapply("total_c", 129, 321, "mg/dL")) # For the following, expect additional problems with HDL-C given # default set to 45, but that's based on mg/dL, whereas the following # test uses mmol/L expect_snapshot(nested_lapply("total_c", 3.3, 8.3, "mmol/L")) }) test_that("HDL-C validation works", { expect_snapshot(nested_lapply("hdl_c", 19, 101, "mg/dL")) # For the following, expect additional problems with total cholesterol given # default set to 200, but that's based on mg/dL, whereas the following # test uses mmol/L expect_snapshot(nested_lapply("hdl_c", 0.5, 2.6, "mmol/L")) }) test_that("Statin validation works", { # Expect instance of testing 0 and FALSE (see `test_vals()`) # to yield (identical) results given those are valid inputs in this case expect_snapshot(nested_lapply("statin")) }) test_that("Diabetes mellitus validation works", { # Expect instance of testing 0 and FALSE (see `test_vals()`) # to yield (identical) results given those are valid inputs in this case expect_snapshot(nested_lapply("dm")) }) test_that("Smoking validation works", { # Expect instance of testing 0 and FALSE (see `test_vals()`) # to yield (identical) results given those are valid inputs in this case expect_snapshot(nested_lapply("smoking")) }) test_that("eGFR validation works", { expect_snapshot(nested_lapply("egfr", 14, 141)) }) test_that("BMI validation works", { expect_snapshot(nested_lapply("bmi", 18.4, 40)) }) # In contrast to when there are problems with required inputs, # expect problems with optional predictors to still yield results # (in this case, from the base model), with notification to the user # about the problems with the optional inputs # # Also, because optional variables are permitted to be empty, # any input that is functionally empty or missing -- such as `NULL`, # `numeric(0)`, `NA`, etc. -- will not be considered problematic and thus not # populate in the `input_problems` column test_that("HbA1c validation works", { expect_snapshot(nested_lapply("hba1c", 4.4, 15.1)) }) test_that("UACR validation works", { expect_snapshot(nested_lapply("uacr", 0.09, 25000.1)) }) test_that("Zip code validation works", { expect_snapshot(nested_lapply("zip")) }) test_that("Model validation works", { expect_snapshot(nested_lapply("model")) }) # Because helper fxs don't expect `time` as an arg, test `time` a bit differently test_that("Time validation works", { check_equations_partial_sans_sex_and_time <- function(sex, time, quiet) { res <- estimate_risk( age = 50, sex = sex, sbp = 160, bp_tx = TRUE, total_c = 200, hdl_c = 45, statin = FALSE, dm = TRUE, smoking = FALSE, egfr = 90, bmi = 35, hba1c = NULL, uacr = NULL, zip = NULL, model = NULL, time = time, chol_unit = "mg/dL", quiet = quiet ) # Because only one NA tibble will be returned, index accordingly # (vs. time-specific indexing, when two tibbles are returned, one # for each time horizon) list( res = res |> dplyr::select(-input_problems), input_probs = res[["input_problems"]] ) } # Chatty versions expect_snapshot( lapply( test_vals(), function(x) check_equations_partial_sans_sex_and_time("f", x, FALSE) ) ) expect_snapshot( lapply( test_vals(), function(x) check_equations_partial_sans_sex_and_time("m", x, FALSE) ) ) # Quiet versions expect_snapshot( lapply( test_vals(), function(x) check_equations_partial_sans_sex_and_time("f", x, TRUE) ) ) expect_snapshot( lapply( test_vals(), function(x) check_equations_partial_sans_sex_and_time("m", x, TRUE) ) ) }) test_that("Cholesterol unit validation works", { expect_snapshot(nested_lapply("chol_unit")) }) # This is to test the centering, etc. to prep terms # for use in the models dat <- data.frame( age = 65, sex = "female", sbp = 160, bp_tx = 1, total_c = 200, hdl_c = 50, statin = 0, dm = 1, smoking = 0, egfr = 90, bmi = 35, hba1c = 8.5, uacr = 40, zip = "10001" ) test_that("Preparation of terms works- Basic", { expect_snapshot(prep_terms(dat, "base")) expect_snapshot(prep_terms(dat, "hba1c")) expect_snapshot(prep_terms(dat, "uacr")) expect_snapshot(prep_terms(dat, "sdi")) expect_snapshot(prep_terms(dat, "full")) }) test_that("Preparation of terms works - No BP tx", { dat$bp_tx <- FALSE expect_snapshot(prep_terms(dat, "base")) expect_snapshot(prep_terms(dat, "hba1c")) expect_snapshot(prep_terms(dat, "uacr")) expect_snapshot(prep_terms(dat, "sdi")) expect_snapshot(prep_terms(dat, "full")) }) test_that("Preparation of terms works - No statin", { dat$statin <- FALSE expect_snapshot(prep_terms(dat, "base")) expect_snapshot(prep_terms(dat, "hba1c")) expect_snapshot(prep_terms(dat, "uacr")) expect_snapshot(prep_terms(dat, "sdi")) expect_snapshot(prep_terms(dat, "full")) }) test_that("Preparation of terms works - No DM", { dat$dm <- FALSE expect_snapshot(prep_terms(dat, "base")) expect_snapshot(prep_terms(dat, "hba1c")) expect_snapshot(prep_terms(dat, "uacr")) expect_snapshot(prep_terms(dat, "sdi")) expect_snapshot(prep_terms(dat, "full")) }) test_that("Preparation of terms works - Missing optional predictors", { # Test missing optional predictors dat$dm <- TRUE dat$hba1c <- NA dat$uacr <- NA dat$zip <- NA expect_snapshot(prep_terms(dat, "hba1c")) expect_snapshot(prep_terms(dat, "uacr")) expect_snapshot(prep_terms(dat, "sdi")) expect_snapshot(prep_terms(dat, "full")) }) test_that("Preparation of terms works - Other SDI categories", { # Test zip where SDI from 4-6 dat$zip <- "44221" expect_snapshot(prep_terms(dat, "sdi")) expect_snapshot(prep_terms(dat, "full")) # Test zip where SDI from 1-3 dat$zip <- "01005" expect_snapshot(prep_terms(dat, "sdi")) expect_snapshot(prep_terms(dat, "full")) }) test_that("Base model 10-year risks give expected results", { expect_snapshot( check_equations( age = 50, total_c = 200, hdl_c = 45, sbp = 160, # Deliberately use variations of TRUE/1 and FALSE/0 dm = TRUE, smoking = 0, bmi = 35, egfr = 90, bp_tx = 1, statin = FALSE, time = "10yr" ) ) }) test_that("UACR model 10-year risks give expected results", { expect_snapshot( check_equations( age = 50, total_c = 200, hdl_c = 45, sbp = 160, # Deliberately use variations of TRUE/1 and FALSE/0 dm = 1, smoking = FALSE, bmi = 35, egfr = 90, bp_tx = TRUE, statin = 0, uacr = 40, time = "10yr" ) ) }) test_that("HbA1c model 10-year risks give expected results", { expect_snapshot( check_equations( age = 50, total_c = 200, hdl_c = 45, sbp = 160, # Deliberately use variations of TRUE/1 and FALSE/0 dm = 1, smoking = FALSE, bmi = 35, egfr = 90, bp_tx = TRUE, statin = 0, hba1c = 7.5, time = "10yr" ) ) }) test_that("Zip model 10-year risks give expected results & SDI lookup works", { sdi_10yr_partial <- function(zip) { check_equations( age = 50, total_c = 200, hdl_c = 45, sbp = 160, # Deliberately use variations of TRUE/1 and FALSE/0 dm = TRUE, smoking = FALSE, bmi = 35, egfr = 90, bp_tx = TRUE, statin = FALSE, zip = zip, time = "10yr" ) } # SDI of 3 expect_snapshot(get_sdi("03883")) expect_snapshot(sdi_10yr_partial(zip = "03883")) # SDI of 5 expect_snapshot(get_sdi("49544")) expect_snapshot(sdi_10yr_partial(zip = "49544")) # SDI of 10 expect_snapshot(get_sdi("49507")) expect_snapshot(sdi_10yr_partial(zip = "49507")) }) test_that("Full model 10-year risks give expected results", { expect_snapshot( check_equations_partial( age = 75, statin = TRUE, dm = 0, smoking = 1, hba1c = 7.5, uacr = 40, zip = "49507", time = "10yr" ) ) }) test_that("Time as character vs. numeric works: Base model, 10-year", { chr_version_1 <- check_equations_partial( age = 67, statin = TRUE, dm = 0, smoking = 1, time = "10yr", quiet = TRUE ) chr_version_2 <- check_equations_partial( age = 67, statin = TRUE, dm = 0, smoking = 1, time = "10", quiet = TRUE ) num_version <- check_equations_partial( age = 67, statin = TRUE, dm = 0, smoking = 1, time = 10, quiet = TRUE ) expect_identical(chr_version_1, num_version) expect_identical(chr_version_1, chr_version_2) expect_identical("base", chr_version_1$model[["female"]]) expect_identical("base", chr_version_1$model[["male"]]) }) test_that("Time as character vs. numeric works: HbA1c model, 10-year", { chr_version_1 <- check_equations_partial( age = 61, statin = TRUE, smoking = 1, hba1c = 9.9, time = "10yr", quiet = TRUE ) chr_version_2 <- check_equations_partial( age = 61, statin = TRUE, smoking = 1, hba1c = 9.9, time = "10", quiet = TRUE ) num_version <- check_equations_partial( age = 61, statin = TRUE, smoking = 1, hba1c = 9.9, time = 10, quiet = TRUE ) expect_identical(chr_version_1, num_version) expect_identical(chr_version_1, chr_version_2) expect_identical("hba1c", chr_version_1$model[["female"]]) expect_identical("hba1c", chr_version_1$model[["male"]]) }) test_that("Time as character vs. numeric works: UACR model, 10-year", { chr_version_1 <- check_equations_partial( age = 75, statin = TRUE, smoking = 1, uacr = 40, time = "10yr", quiet = TRUE ) chr_version_2 <- check_equations_partial( age = 75, statin = TRUE, smoking = 1, uacr = 40, time = "10", quiet = TRUE ) num_version <- check_equations_partial( age = 75, statin = TRUE, smoking = 1, uacr = 40, time = 10, quiet = TRUE ) expect_identical(chr_version_1, num_version) expect_identical(chr_version_1, chr_version_2) expect_identical("uacr", chr_version_1$model[["female"]]) expect_identical("uacr", chr_version_1$model[["male"]]) }) test_that("Time as character vs. numeric works: SDI model, 10-year", { chr_version_1 <- check_equations_partial( age = 75, statin = TRUE, smoking = 1, zip = "49507", time = "10yr", quiet = TRUE ) chr_version_2 <- check_equations_partial( age = 75, statin = TRUE, smoking = 1, zip = "49507", time = "10", quiet = TRUE ) num_version <- check_equations_partial( age = 75, statin = TRUE, smoking = 1, zip = "49507", time = 10, quiet = TRUE ) expect_identical(chr_version_1, num_version) expect_identical(chr_version_1, chr_version_2) expect_identical("sdi", chr_version_1$model[["female"]]) expect_identical("sdi", chr_version_1$model[["male"]]) }) test_that("Time as character vs. numeric works: Full model, 10-year", { chr_version_1 <- check_equations_partial( age = 75, statin = TRUE, smoking = 1, hba1c = 7.5, uacr = 40, zip = "49507", time = "10yr", quiet = TRUE ) chr_version_2 <- check_equations_partial( age = 75, statin = TRUE, smoking = 1, hba1c = 7.5, uacr = 40, zip = "49507", time = "10", quiet = TRUE ) num_version <- check_equations_partial( age = 75, statin = TRUE, smoking = 1, hba1c = 7.5, uacr = 40, zip = "49507", time = 10, quiet = TRUE ) expect_identical(chr_version_1, num_version) expect_identical(chr_version_1, chr_version_2) expect_identical("full", chr_version_1$model[["female"]]) expect_identical("full", chr_version_1$model[["male"]]) }) test_that("Base model 30-year risks give expected results", { expect_snapshot( check_equations( age = 50, total_c = 200, hdl_c = 45, sbp = 160, # Deliberately use variations of TRUE/1 and FALSE/0 dm = TRUE, smoking = 0, bmi = 35, egfr = 90, bp_tx = 1, statin = FALSE, time = "30yr" ) ) }) test_that("UACR model 30-year risks give expected results", { expect_snapshot( check_equations( age = 50, total_c = 200, hdl_c = 45, sbp = 160, # Deliberately use variations of TRUE/1 and FALSE/0 dm = 1, smoking = FALSE, bmi = 35, egfr = 90, bp_tx = TRUE, statin = 0, uacr = 40, time = "30yr" ) ) }) test_that("HbA1c model 30-year risks give expected results", { expect_snapshot( check_equations( age = 50, total_c = 200, hdl_c = 45, sbp = 160, # Deliberately use variations of TRUE/1 and FALSE/0 dm = 1, smoking = FALSE, bmi = 35, egfr = 90, bp_tx = TRUE, statin = 0, hba1c = 7.5, time = "30yr" ) ) }) test_that("Zip model 30-year risks give expected results & SDI lookup works", { sdi_30yr_partial <- function(zip) { check_equations( age = 50, total_c = 200, hdl_c = 45, sbp = 160, # Deliberately use variations of TRUE/1 and FALSE/0 dm = TRUE, smoking = FALSE, bmi = 35, egfr = 90, bp_tx = TRUE, statin = FALSE, zip = zip, time = "30yr" ) } # SDI of 3 expect_snapshot(get_sdi("03883")) expect_snapshot(sdi_30yr_partial(zip = "03883")) # SDI of 5 expect_snapshot(get_sdi("49544")) expect_snapshot(sdi_30yr_partial(zip = "49544")) # SDI of 10 expect_snapshot(get_sdi("49507")) expect_snapshot(sdi_30yr_partial(zip = "49507")) }) test_that("Full model 30-year risks give expected results", { expect_snapshot( check_equations_partial( age = 75, statin = TRUE, dm = 0, smoking = 1, hba1c = 7.5, uacr = 40, zip = "49507", time = "30yr" ) ) }) test_that("Time as character vs. numeric works: Base model, 30-year", { chr_version_1 <- check_equations_partial( age = 67, statin = TRUE, dm = 0, smoking = 1, time = "30yr", quiet = TRUE ) chr_version_2 <- check_equations_partial( age = 67, statin = TRUE, dm = 0, smoking = 1, time = "30", quiet = TRUE ) num_version <- check_equations_partial( age = 67, statin = TRUE, dm = 0, smoking = 1, time = 30, quiet = TRUE ) expect_identical(chr_version_1, num_version) expect_identical(chr_version_1, chr_version_2) expect_identical("base", chr_version_1$model[["female"]]) expect_identical("base", chr_version_1$model[["male"]]) }) test_that("Time as character vs. numeric works: HbA1c model, 30-year", { chr_version_1 <- check_equations_partial( age = 61, statin = TRUE, smoking = 1, hba1c = 9.9, time = "30yr", quiet = TRUE ) chr_version_2 <- check_equations_partial( age = 61, statin = TRUE, smoking = 1, hba1c = 9.9, time = "30", quiet = TRUE ) num_version <- check_equations_partial( age = 61, statin = TRUE, smoking = 1, hba1c = 9.9, time = 30, quiet = TRUE ) expect_identical(chr_version_1, num_version) expect_identical(chr_version_1, chr_version_2) expect_identical("hba1c", chr_version_1$model[["female"]]) expect_identical("hba1c", chr_version_1$model[["male"]]) }) test_that("Time as character vs. numeric works: UACR model, 30-year", { chr_version_1 <- check_equations_partial( age = 75, statin = TRUE, smoking = 1, uacr = 40, time = "30yr", quiet = TRUE ) chr_version_2 <- check_equations_partial( age = 75, statin = TRUE, smoking = 1, uacr = 40, time = "30", quiet = TRUE ) num_version <- check_equations_partial( age = 75, statin = TRUE, smoking = 1, uacr = 40, time = 30, quiet = TRUE ) expect_identical(chr_version_1, num_version) expect_identical(chr_version_1, chr_version_2) expect_identical("uacr", chr_version_1$model[["female"]]) expect_identical("uacr", chr_version_1$model[["male"]]) }) test_that("Time as character vs. numeric works: SDI model, 30-year", { chr_version_1 <- check_equations_partial( age = 75, statin = TRUE, smoking = 1, zip = "49507", time = "30yr", quiet = TRUE ) chr_version_2 <- check_equations_partial( age = 75, statin = TRUE, smoking = 1, zip = "49507", time = "30", quiet = TRUE ) num_version <- check_equations_partial( age = 75, statin = TRUE, smoking = 1, zip = "49507", time = 30, quiet = TRUE ) expect_identical(chr_version_1, num_version) expect_identical(chr_version_1, chr_version_2) expect_identical("sdi", chr_version_1$model[["female"]]) expect_identical("sdi", chr_version_1$model[["male"]]) }) test_that("Time as character vs. numeric works: Full model, 30-year", { chr_version_1 <- check_equations_partial( age = 75, statin = TRUE, smoking = 1, hba1c = 7.5, uacr = 40, zip = "49507", time = "30yr", quiet = TRUE ) chr_version_2 <- check_equations_partial( age = 75, statin = TRUE, smoking = 1, hba1c = 7.5, uacr = 40, zip = "49507", time = "30", quiet = TRUE ) num_version <- check_equations_partial( age = 75, statin = TRUE, smoking = 1, hba1c = 7.5, uacr = 40, zip = "49507", time = 30, quiet = TRUE ) expect_identical(chr_version_1, num_version) expect_identical(chr_version_1, chr_version_2) expect_identical("full", chr_version_1$model[["female"]]) expect_identical("full", chr_version_1$model[["male"]]) }) test_that("Cholesterol unit abbreviation works", { mg_full <- check_equations_partial(chol_unit = "mg/dL", quiet = TRUE) mg_abbrev <- check_equations_partial(chol_unit = "mg", quiet = TRUE) mmol_abbrev <- check_equations_partial( chol_unit = "mmol", total_c = 4, hdl_c = 1, quiet = TRUE ) mmol_full <- check_equations_partial( chol_unit = "mmol/L", total_c = 4, hdl_c = 1, quiet = TRUE ) expect_identical(mg_full, mg_abbrev) expect_identical(mmol_abbrev, mmol_full) }) test_that("Optional predictors are handled correctly, one optional predictor is valid", { # ... in terms of model selection and results # UACR model shold run uacr_okay_hba1c_not_zip_null <- check_equations_partial( age = 75, statin = TRUE, smoking = 1, uacr = 40, hba1c = 75, zip = NULL, quiet = TRUE ) uacr_okay_hba1c_null_zip_not <- check_equations_partial( age = 75, statin = TRUE, smoking = 1, uacr = 40, hba1c = NULL, zip = "99999", quiet = TRUE ) uacr_okay_others_not <- check_equations_partial( age = 75, statin = TRUE, smoking = 1, uacr = 40, hba1c = 75, zip = "99999", quiet = TRUE ) uacr_model_by_itself <- check_equations_partial( age = 75, statin = TRUE, smoking = 1, uacr = 40, quiet = TRUE ) # Review input problems expect_snapshot( list( uacr_okay_hba1c_not_zip_null = uacr_okay_hba1c_not_zip_null$input_problems, uacr_okay_hba1c_null_zip_not = uacr_okay_hba1c_null_zip_not$input_problems, uacr_okay_others_not = uacr_okay_others_not$input_problems, uacr_model_by_itself = uacr_model_by_itself$input_problems ) ) # Set `input_problems` to NULL to avoid comparing it now uacr_okay_hba1c_not_zip_null$input_problems <- uacr_okay_hba1c_null_zip_not$input_problems <- uacr_okay_others_not$input_problems <- uacr_model_by_itself$input_problems <- NULL expect_identical(uacr_okay_hba1c_not_zip_null, uacr_model_by_itself) expect_identical(uacr_okay_hba1c_null_zip_not, uacr_model_by_itself) expect_identical(uacr_okay_others_not, uacr_model_by_itself) expect_identical(unique(uacr_okay_hba1c_not_zip_null$model), "uacr") # HbA1c model shold run hba1c_okay_uacr_not_zip_null <- check_equations_partial( age = 75, statin = TRUE, smoking = 1, uacr = 4000000, hba1c = 7.5, zip = NULL, quiet = TRUE ) hba1c_okay_uacr_null_zip_not <- check_equations_partial( age = 75, statin = TRUE, smoking = 1, uacr = NULL, hba1c = 7.5, zip = "99999", quiet = TRUE ) hba1c_okay_others_not <- check_equations_partial( age = 75, statin = TRUE, smoking = 1, uacr = 4000000, hba1c = 7.5, zip = "99999", quiet = TRUE ) hba1c_model_by_itself <- check_equations_partial( age = 75, statin = TRUE, smoking = 1, hba1c = 7.5, quiet = TRUE ) # Review input problems expect_snapshot( list( hba1c_okay_uacr_not_zip_null = hba1c_okay_uacr_not_zip_null$input_problems, hba1c_okay_uacr_null_zip_not = hba1c_okay_uacr_null_zip_not$input_problems, hba1c_okay_others_not = hba1c_okay_others_not$input_problems, hba1c_model_by_itself = hba1c_model_by_itself$input_problems ) ) # Set `input_problems` to NULL to avoid comparing it now hba1c_okay_uacr_not_zip_null$input_problems <- hba1c_okay_uacr_null_zip_not$input_problems <- hba1c_okay_others_not$input_problems <- hba1c_model_by_itself$input_problems <- NULL expect_identical(hba1c_okay_uacr_not_zip_null, hba1c_model_by_itself) expect_identical(hba1c_okay_uacr_null_zip_not, hba1c_model_by_itself) expect_identical(hba1c_okay_others_not, hba1c_model_by_itself) expect_identical(unique(hba1c_okay_uacr_not_zip_null$model), "hba1c") # SDI model should run zip_okay_uacr_not_hba1c_null <- check_equations_partial( age = 75, statin = TRUE, smoking = 1, uacr = 4000000, hba1c = NULL, zip = "49507", quiet = TRUE ) zip_okay_uacr_null_hba1c_not <- check_equations_partial( age = 75, statin = TRUE, smoking = 1, uacr = NULL, hba1c = 75, zip = "49507", quiet = TRUE ) zip_okay_others_not <- check_equations_partial( age = 75, statin = TRUE, smoking = 1, uacr = 4000000, hba1c = 75, zip = "49507", quiet = TRUE ) zip_by_itself <- check_equations_partial( age = 75, statin = TRUE, smoking = 1, zip = "49507", quiet = TRUE ) # Review input problems expect_snapshot( list( zip_okay_uacr_not_hba1c_null = zip_okay_uacr_not_hba1c_null$input_problems, zip_okay_uacr_null_hba1c_not = zip_okay_uacr_null_hba1c_not$input_problems, zip_okay_others_not = zip_okay_others_not$input_problems, zip_by_itself = zip_by_itself$input_problems ) ) # Set `input_problems` to NULL to avoid comparing it now zip_okay_uacr_not_hba1c_null$input_problems <- zip_okay_uacr_null_hba1c_not$input_problems <- zip_okay_others_not$input_problems <- zip_by_itself$input_problems <- NULL expect_identical(zip_okay_uacr_not_hba1c_null, zip_by_itself) expect_identical(zip_okay_uacr_null_hba1c_not, zip_by_itself) expect_identical(zip_okay_others_not, zip_by_itself) expect_identical(unique(zip_okay_uacr_not_hba1c_null$model), "sdi") }) test_that("Optional predictors are handled correctly, two optional predictors are valid", { full_model_invalid_uacr <- check_equations_partial( age = 45, statin = TRUE, sbp = 148, uacr = 4000000, hba1c = 7.5, zip = "49507", quiet = TRUE ) full_model_uacr_null <- check_equations_partial( age = 45, statin = TRUE, sbp = 148, uacr = NULL, hba1c = 7.5, zip = "49507", quiet = TRUE ) # Review input problems expect_snapshot( list( full_model_invalid_uacr = full_model_invalid_uacr$input_problems, full_model_uacr_null = full_model_uacr_null$input_problems ) ) # Set `input_problems` to NULL to avoid comparing it now full_model_invalid_uacr$input_problems <- full_model_uacr_null$input_problems <- NULL expect_identical(full_model_invalid_uacr, full_model_uacr_null) expect_identical(unique(full_model_invalid_uacr$model), "full") full_model_invalid_hba1c <- check_equations_partial( age = 45, statin = TRUE, sbp = 148, uacr = 40, hba1c = 75, zip = "49507", quiet = TRUE ) full_model_hba1c_null <- check_equations_partial( age = 45, statin = TRUE, sbp = 148, uacr = 40, hba1c = NULL, zip = "49507", quiet = TRUE ) # Review input problems expect_snapshot( list( full_model_invalid_hba1c = full_model_invalid_hba1c$input_problems, full_model_hba1c_null = full_model_hba1c_null$input_problems ) ) # Set `input_problems` to NULL to avoid comparing it now full_model_invalid_hba1c$input_problems <- full_model_hba1c_null$input_problems <- NULL expect_identical(full_model_invalid_hba1c, full_model_hba1c_null) expect_identical(unique(full_model_invalid_hba1c$model), "full") full_model_invalid_zip <- check_equations_partial( age = 45, statin = TRUE, sbp = 148, uacr = 40, hba1c = 7.5, zip = "99999", quiet = TRUE ) full_model_zip_null <- check_equations_partial( age = 45, statin = TRUE, sbp = 148, uacr = 40, hba1c = 7.5, zip = NULL, quiet = TRUE ) # Review input problems expect_snapshot( list( full_model_invalid_zip = full_model_invalid_zip$input_problems, full_model_zip_null = full_model_zip_null$input_problems ) ) # Set `input_problems` to NULL to avoid comparing it now full_model_invalid_zip$input_problems <- full_model_zip_null$input_problems <- NULL expect_identical(full_model_invalid_zip, full_model_zip_null) expect_identical(unique(full_model_invalid_zip$model), "full") }) test_that("Invalid UACR is same as no UACR, only optional is UACR", { invalid_uacr <- check_equations_partial(uacr = 4000000, quiet = TRUE) no_uacr <- check_equations_partial(uacr = NULL, quiet = TRUE) # Review input problems expect_snapshot( list( invalid_uacr = invalid_uacr$input_problems, no_uacr = no_uacr$input_problems ) ) # Set `input_problems` to NULL to avoid comparing it now invalid_uacr$input_problems <- no_uacr$input_problems <- NULL expect_identical(invalid_uacr, no_uacr) expect_identical(unique(invalid_uacr$model), "base") }) test_that("Invalid HbA1c is same as no HbA1c, only optional is HbA1c", { invalid_hba1c <- check_equations_partial(hba1c = 75, quiet = TRUE) no_hba1c <- check_equations_partial(hba1c = NULL, quiet = TRUE) # Review input problems expect_snapshot( list( invalid_hba1c = invalid_hba1c$input_problems, no_hba1c = no_hba1c$input_problems ) ) # Set `input_problems` to NULL to avoid comparing it now invalid_hba1c$input_problems <- no_hba1c$input_problems <- NULL expect_identical(invalid_hba1c, no_hba1c) expect_identical(unique(invalid_hba1c$model), "base") }) test_that("Invalid zip is same as no zip, only optional is zip", { invalid_zip <- check_equations_partial(zip = "99999", quiet = TRUE) no_zip <- check_equations_partial(zip = NULL, quiet = TRUE) # Review input problems expect_snapshot( list( invalid_zip = invalid_zip$input_problems, no_zip = no_zip$input_problems ) ) # Set `input_problems` to NULL to avoid comparing it now invalid_zip$input_problems <- no_zip$input_problems <- NULL expect_identical(invalid_zip, no_zip) expect_identical(unique(invalid_zip$model), "base") }) test_that("Enforcing strict optional input validation works", { empty_table <- dplyr::tibble( total_cvd = NA_real_, ascvd = NA_real_, heart_failure = NA_real_, chd = NA_real_, stroke = NA_real_, model = "none", over_years = NA_integer_ ) empty_list_of_tables <- list( risk_est_10yr = empty_table, risk_est_30yr = empty_table ) remove_input_probs <- function(x) { lapply(x, function(x) dplyr::select(x, -input_problems)) } get_input_probs <- function(x) { unique(vapply(x, function(x) dplyr::pull(x, input_problems), character(1))) } # UACR uacr <- estimate_risk_partial( uacr = 9000000, optional_strict = TRUE, quiet = TRUE ) uacr_input_problems <- get_input_probs(uacr) uacr_remove_input_problems <- remove_input_probs(uacr) # HbA1c hb1ac <- estimate_risk_partial( hba1c = 75, optional_strict = TRUE, quiet = TRUE ) hb1ac_input_problems <- get_input_probs(hb1ac) hb1ac_remove_input_problems <- remove_input_probs(hb1ac) # ZIP zip <- estimate_risk_partial( zip = "99999", optional_strict = TRUE, quiet = TRUE ) zip_input_problems <- get_input_probs(zip) zip_remove_input_problems <- remove_input_probs(zip) # UACR and HbA1c uacr_hba1c <- estimate_risk_partial( uacr = 9000000, hba1c = 75, optional_strict = TRUE, quiet = TRUE ) uacr_hba1c_input_problems <- get_input_probs(uacr_hba1c) uacr_hba1c_remove_input_problems <- remove_input_probs(uacr_hba1c) # UACR and ZIP uacr_zip <- estimate_risk_partial( uacr = 9000000, zip = "99999", optional_strict = TRUE, quiet = TRUE ) uacr_zip_input_problems <- get_input_probs(uacr_zip) uacr_zip_remove_input_problems <- remove_input_probs(uacr_zip) # HbA1c and ZIP hba1c_zip <- estimate_risk_partial( hba1c = 75, zip = "99999", optional_strict = TRUE, quiet = TRUE ) hba1c_zip_input_problems <- get_input_probs(hba1c_zip) hba1c_zip_remove_input_problems <- remove_input_probs(hba1c_zip) # UACR, HbA1c, and ZIP uacr_hba1c_zip <- estimate_risk_partial( uacr = 9000000, hba1c = 75, zip = "99999", optional_strict = TRUE, quiet = TRUE ) uacr_hba1c_zip_input_problems <- get_input_probs(uacr_hba1c_zip) uacr_hba1c_zip_remove_input_problems <- remove_input_probs(uacr_hba1c_zip) # Review input problems expect_snapshot( list( uacr = uacr_input_problems, hb1ac = hb1ac_input_problems, zip = zip_input_problems, uacr_hba1c = uacr_hba1c_input_problems, uacr_zip = uacr_zip_input_problems, hba1c_zip = hba1c_zip_input_problems, uacr_hba1c_zip = uacr_hba1c_zip_input_problems ) ) expect_equal(uacr_remove_input_problems, empty_list_of_tables) expect_equal(hb1ac_remove_input_problems, empty_list_of_tables) expect_equal(zip_remove_input_problems, empty_list_of_tables) expect_equal(uacr_hba1c_remove_input_problems, empty_list_of_tables) expect_equal(uacr_zip_remove_input_problems, empty_list_of_tables) expect_equal(hba1c_zip_remove_input_problems, empty_list_of_tables) expect_equal(uacr_hba1c_zip_remove_input_problems, empty_list_of_tables) }) test_that("Additional checks of results, for good measure", { # At this point, given how the package is written (e.g., to ensure # full concordance between coefficients and term prep), with tests # thus far, further testing is essentially superfluous, but more tests # never hurt anyone :-) expect_snapshot( check_equations_partial( age = 67, statin = FALSE, hba1c = 9 ) ) expect_snapshot( check_equations_partial( age = 67, statin = TRUE, uacr = 1000 ) ) expect_snapshot( check_equations_partial( age = 71, statin = TRUE, hba1c = 9, uacr = 1000 ) ) expect_snapshot( check_equations_partial( age = 71, statin = TRUE, hba1c = 9, uacr = 1000, zip = "49507" ) ) expect_snapshot( check_equations_partial( age = 71, sbp = 145, bp_tx = 0, hba1c = 6.7, uacr = 10, zip = NA ) ) res_v1 <- check_equations_partial( age = 35, sbp = 145, bp_tx = 1, uacr = 10, zip = NA, quiet = TRUE ) res_v2 <- check_equations_partial( age = 35, sbp = 145, bp_tx = 1, uacr = 10, quiet = TRUE ) identical_res <- identical(res_v1, res_v2) expect_snapshot(res_v1) expect_snapshot(res_v2) expect_true(identical_res) })