test_that("betweenness works for kite graph", { kite <- graph_from_literal( Andre - Beverly:Carol:Diane:Fernando, Beverly - Andre:Diane:Ed:Garth, Carol - Andre:Diane:Fernando, Diane - Andre:Beverly:Carol:Ed:Fernando:Garth, Ed - Beverly:Diane:Garth, Fernando - Andre:Carol:Diane:Garth:Heather, Garth - Beverly:Diane:Ed:Fernando:Heather, Heather - Fernando:Garth:Ike, Ike - Heather:Jane, Jane - Ike ) nf <- (vcount(kite) - 1) * (vcount(kite) - 2) / 2 bet <- structure(betweenness(kite) / nf, names = V(kite)$name) bet <- round(sort(bet, decreasing = TRUE), 3) expect_equal(bet, structure(c(0.389, 0.231, 0.231, 0.222, 0.102, 0.023, 0.023, 0.000, 0.000, 0.000), names = c("Heather", "Fernando", "Garth", "Ike", "Diane", "Andre", "Beverly", "Carol", "Ed", "Jane"))) bet2 <- structure(betweenness(kite, normalized = TRUE), names = V(kite)$name) bet2 <- round(sort(bet2, decreasing = TRUE), 3) expect_equal(bet2, bet) }) test_that("weighted betweenness works", { nontriv <- make_graph(c( 0, 19, 0, 16, 0, 20, 1, 19, 2, 5, 3, 7, 3, 8, 4, 15, 4, 11, 5, 8, 5, 19, 6, 7, 6, 10, 6, 8, 6, 9, 7, 20, 9, 10, 9, 20, 10, 19, 11, 12, 11, 20, 12, 15, 13, 15, 14, 18, 14, 16, 14, 17, 15, 16, 17, 18 ) + 1, dir = FALSE) E(nontriv)$weight <- c( 0.5249, 1, 0.1934, 0.6274, 0.5249, 0.0029, 0.3831, 0.05, 0.6274, 0.3831, 0.5249, 0.0587, 0.0579, 0.0562, 0.0562, 0.1934, 0.6274, 0.6274, 0.6274, 0.0418, 0.6274, 0.3511, 0.3511, 0.1486, 1, 1, 0.0711, 0.2409 ) nontrivRes <- c( 20, 0, 0, 0, 0, 19, 80, 85, 32, 0, 10, 75, 70, 0, 36, 81, 60, 0, 19, 19, 86 ) bet <- betweenness(nontriv) expect_equal(bet, nontrivRes) }) test_that("normalization works well", { g1 <- graph_from_literal(0 + -+1 + -+2) b11 <- betweenness(g1, normalized = TRUE, directed = FALSE) expect_equal(b11, c("0" = 0, "1" = 1, "2" = 0)) b12 <- betweenness(g1, normalized = TRUE, directed = TRUE) expect_equal(b12, c("0" = 0, "1" = 1, "2" = 0)) g2 <- graph_from_literal(0 - --1 - --2) b2 <- betweenness(g2, normalized = TRUE) expect_equal(b2, c("0" = 0, "1" = 1, "2" = 0)) }) test_that("shortest paths are compared with tolerance when calculating betweenness", { # The test case below is designed in a way that the paths 3-6 and 3-4-6 have the # same total weight when compared with a tolerance, but they appear different # if the comparison is made without an epsilon tolerance due to numeric # inaccuracies. # # See https://github.com/igraph/rigraph/issues/314 from <- c(1, 2, 3, 3, 3, 4, 6, 7, 2, 9, 5, 7, 9, 9, 5, 8) to <- c(4, 3, 6, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16) edges <- cbind(from, to) edges.dists <- c( 1.9617537, 0.9060834, 2.2165446, 1.6251956, 2.4473929, 0.5913490, 8.7093236, 2.8387330, 6.1225042, 20.7217776, 6.8027218, 16.3147479, 5.2605598, 6.6816853, 4.9482123, 1.8989790 ) g <- graph_from_data_frame(edges, directed = FALSE) result <- betweenness(g, weights = edges.dists) expect_equal(result[1:5], c("1" = 0, "2" = 44, "3" = 71, "4" = 36.5, "6" = 44)) })