after i get all N i V B V and give to N for V but i think it make N J to V all N on these N . there are several N N J . P is trying to get with P to get his take on P . P , just a N as to whether P has been V that we are V the N of these N to V N or N N and V with N N N ? we may want to V a J N V the N and their N so that we have it for our N . by N of this N , i am asking P to call the N N to V them of your N . hi P , i am working on a N that V the N of N N . i do not have V N of several P P N . would you V V them down to me via P as soon as possible on P ? please call P before the N V , as it is a J J N N and not a J one . P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P would you V asking the N if they have these ? if not , could you get with P to get them ? i 've asked them for N , and i 've got them from D of them . tell him to V out -- his N 's N has been V and V too many N to V . i will V you with a N upon N . additionally , N for P V to call me and V me N for N V for P N . i V that he may be B J to V your N and may have the N while i am out on N next week . i have V him a N N telling him that you may give him a call , so he will be V . the only one in N is for P P , whose N we did not have . P is going to V the N in the N and give it to P . P will V the N N and N to the N and get it to P for V . P called me last week for some N . i had to leave a N for him when i called him B . so , i gave him your N as N in N he needs J N . just wanted you to know that he might be V one of you . P , late last week , i V a call from P P , who does N N at P . she V that they would like for there to be a N for how to V N if there is a N to V the N of N from P to P or N B . of B , such N would have to be V at the N of the N to V any N of J - for - all . at a N , i would think that you and P P would have to be the N who make the N . with that thought , i have asked P P 's N to work on such a N . in the N , P V that one N in P P 's N wants to go to P . she V that P had said it was J . if not , should you give P a call about it ? i am V about the J N , so i V we should V with J N . i have V the N for N . he has a D - N J J J after the N of his N . if not , we have to make N about V him in N . one of our N wants to V N that N , with some N of V N if they take it . your J N on this would be V . P , the J on N N is P P , you asked me to V my N about the N N N V to V N N that are V on N . this N does not V a N 's N as V to one 's N , but instead looks at the N of N N and V that a N be in the J D of those N . thus , if there are only D N N N