ultimately more N , but for now , it 's a J start . or , were you looking for more N or N i want to make J that we are looking out for our N at this N in N . if there is someone who is having a particular N , now is a N to be V . i also want to make J that we are doing everything in our N to V N . if you have a N , now may be the N to V do you really have to V that N B now . are you J i do n't need to be there ? if i leave here i will call your N so you know how to V me . that is one of the N we are working on . at this N in N P will be J for this N , if they V their N under the J N N , which would leave them with J V to the N . the N they V V the N was there , if it is not there , the N will be J . V it to say all of these N will be V N of before it N . when N get J the N always gets J . use N for next D N and then use B if you need me . V N does n't work so well at N i 'm V in the N V on the N . going to P P N and will be B P N . P , P i would V that we have V the N before there is any N . if your N is after we V then i would feel more J V some of the N . do you think that i can V this pending N with P ? i should be B in P N on P . where do you want to V to V over there ? do you want to V N B before ? where do you want to V to go over there ? there are still some V N to be V out . these are my N V upon J N of the N and some N for the last few N . a J N with P might V me to V that he would think i might be being too J on P . if you need N V it to the N . i V to V something this week can you V me an N for the D N on P in N ? i ca then V and get it on my N in the N the N is that in N to V the N there is a J N of the N being in N which may have some more N . if we want to V then we need to V and V . i would think that if they V in N it should not be a N , the N V for D are currently V , but if we get a N to V for N B we will . J N is that the N will have to be V as outside of the N . B that we will be J to do some J moving of N to V for this , but not V . while talking with P and P a N was asked on N N for P P . the N has to do with V over previously V N from D to D . in P D , this N was V to V in D in the D N as a N N D . V N in D for P one . J N of N not needed for P one N V , may still V D . N V with J work - N . possible N to be V over and V in D D . N one V N in D N . V J carryover not currently in D N D . N two in D N in the P P D . i have to be V against the P P ? D does go against the P N of D . D D , will the N V from P P V the N V from the N ?