please V N are V going B . they will be V with us at our N . it will be J to V P and P get to know one another ! she is an J N , but i am J that they do well . by the N , P is V N N two -- i think that when she is here she will be about D N J . i thought that i would let you know what her N N are on the off N that you might be in P at that N . it would be N for all of us to get B . i do n't know if i had told you , but P P has V P and this week i saw another J first P N , P P , who was on his first N here . we could also V a first P N if you could be here . if it does n't work this N , just let me know the next N you will be in P and i will round up all the J N for a N or J hour . i may need to V to P in P or P . i will let you know if my N N V . i V your N B to P , and i V P 's N to put a N in N of N , including J N N , about the need for N N . if this is the J N to put that in N for P , then by all means go B with that . if there is an J N to V this N as an P - J N to V and V these N across all N and all N V , then that would be J . it simply helps put the P N in the N of an P - J N that we all feel is J . a N being V out under P P 's N - your N on the N N ? N in J P P P P P on the means of N , i am not J from your N whether or not i B V the N . is there an N to be V in an P N yes and in N a N to be V under P 's N if so , to whom will the N be V ? or is the N from P an N to be V as a N in to the N ? yes - N if there is N with N to a J N , i think that one of the J N around J N N are that they are V to be J in N , V to every N and every N where we V in N N . with these N N V B , we will know as N N that N is being V and we will be J to V P J N that there is N in N N B . these J N also should V P to V its N V more quickly , with well V N with N to N N . i am not J from the N as V that the J N of this N comes across . P - but the N was V at P - would V the N to work on this with you and P finally , a N regarding N . the last i knew after you and P V this starting N for J N N was that this was being V P took this to do after N 's N to P for N to all N N . i do n't V that we are quite at the N that we can say that all N N B have V , V and have V these N . and not to V the N of V the N , the J part and the J N behind this will be an J N N on a J N against these N . my N to P P is that i will have that J N in N by the N of the N . there is much work to do in V the N and N of the N and even more work to do to V J N of N for V the N . P has V P P to work on this , and i V that P has already been working with P P . so i V whether or not you want to V N about J N that we can not yet V against . would a more J N be after the P P P N in P when we should have J N - in and N to these N and B our first N of a J N N ? can we V this - please see J N from me to P P that this N looks so B . i have been V N while V , so i V that it makes N . since you asked for N , i V that you do n't V that i gave you some . a N being V out under P P 's N - your N on the N N ? we are in the J N of this N - where we V a N N for P which will V this for N within P the P P N have you any N on N or V N ?