so , i 'll work with P to come up with the N and then V it on to you and the P J N for N . at some N when i have more of a N i 'll call you . P P just V me to another J N of J N , the P P . V around in J N , V each other with N . it 's J , each one of you V J N of J N to me . i think we would have to talk to P . i would n't be J that they had some N or N that wo n't V them to V the N of other N . are J N , there are a N of J N in N with them , i 've V with J N on other N . if you need us to talk to them get me the N and N N of a N and we 'll give them a call . i 'm working with P on N of our N N for J N . P asked me to V you about the N we should take with N to J N with P N . should P be V for all N of N with all N of N ? are there are J N we should n't V for N outside the N , such as the N ? are there any N that might not be V for V out of P , such as N , or any N ? are there any J N of N we might need to V in our N ? any N you could give us with this would be most J ! we V to see N on your next N over ! B a N with a J N , V B , N over the N , and J N N . i do V i am quite J at your N of me being the N . my N has n't gone in yet and i V i am going to have to V . per P 's N , you were going to get B to us on the N on P and N N . what do you want to do with N where we have a N that we got the N in , but we have a J N , and no N should be done until we get a J N ? i hear from P you V quite the N in your N N , B down to having the J N of P N . the N says you also did some J J two N . the J N of P must look J after the V N of P . we B wo n't see you for a few N , but i really V our N and N . the J N N must have V to P 's J N , thus V a N of V N , hence , no J N which , i 'm J , is the only N we have n't gotten a N N from you in quite some N . the N 's N N here in the P P says that the J N in N V N or N N N has now V to the N and is becoming quite the N . N N are quite J in V the N here in P , but i can see J J N in P and P P showing off their N and N . we V our P from P V in N ! obviously , everyone V to P P in the N . she looked up P P , who P P , our P P N , V to , and P is a P , but she did n't see his J N on the N . she V for the P P that we try and use P P , a N she says is very J , or P P . she said we could have her , but she would be very J ! perhaps we should set up a N to talk to P P about the P N , so we make J we get a J N V to us . i am still trying to get the N of P . P P is out N so i have to get them from P P . i have V that N is one of your most V N N ! am J you V and look B to seeing you . please let me know if it V with your N . as you V , we are V as N on N of P in N with their N N . since it was n't an N , what should i V them ? i do n't know that i can V them a N of our P P . so each and N we do a N with them we are going to have to get a N V V into the N .