R Under development (unstable) (2024-08-17 r87027 ucrt) -- "Unsuffered Consequences" Copyright (C) 2024 The R Foundation for Statistical Computing Platform: x86_64-w64-mingw32/x64 R is free software and comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. You are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions. Type 'license()' or 'licence()' for distribution details. R is a collaborative project with many contributors. Type 'contributors()' for more information and 'citation()' on how to cite R or R packages in publications. Type 'demo()' for some demos, 'help()' for on-line help, or 'help.start()' for an HTML browser interface to help. Type 'q()' to quit R. > library(testthat) > library(ctsem) Loading required package: Rcpp ctsem also changes in time, for manual run ctDocs(), for blog see https://cdriver.netlify.app/, for citation info run citation('ctsem'), for original OpenMx functionality install.packages('ctsemOMX'), and for discussion https://github.com/cdriveraus/ctsem/discussions > pdf(NULL) > test_check("ctsem") [,1] [,2] [1,] "0" "0" [2,] "0" "diff" [,1] [1,] "0" [,1] [1,] "0" [2,] "cint" starting worker pid=189056 on localhost:11145 at 14:39:22.015 starting worker pid=139860 on localhost:11145 at 14:39:22.019 Loading required package: data.table Loading required package: data.table starting worker pid=170980 on localhost:11145 at 14:39:41.893 starting worker pid=193032 on localhost:11145 at 14:39:41.905 Loading required package: data.table Loading required package: data.table starting worker pid=184416 on localhost:11145 at 14:39:54.280 starting worker pid=35100 on localhost:11145 at 14:39:54.561 SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'ctsm' NOW (CHAIN 1). Chain 1: Chain 1: Gradient evaluation took 0.007103 seconds Chain 1: 1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 71.03 seconds. Chain 1: Adjust your expectations accordingly! Chain 1: Chain 1: Chain 1: Iteration: 1 / 300 [ 0%] (Warmup) SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'ctsm' NOW (CHAIN 2). Chain 2: Chain 2: Gradient evaluation took 0.007551 seconds Chain 2: 1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 75.51 seconds. Chain 2: Adjust your expectations accordingly! Chain 2: Chain 2: Chain 2: Iteration: 1 / 300 [ 0%] (Warmup) Chain 2: Iteration: 20 / 300 [ 6%] (Warmup) Chain 2: Iteration: 40 / 300 [ 13%] (Warmup) Chain 1: Iteration: 20 / 300 [ 6%] (Warmup) Chain 2: Iteration: 60 / 300 [ 20%] (Warmup) Chain 1: Iteration: 40 / 300 [ 13%] (Warmup) Chain 2: Iteration: 80 / 300 [ 26%] (Warmup) Chain 2: Iteration: 100 / 300 [ 33%] (Warmup) Chain 1: Iteration: 60 / 300 [ 20%] (Warmup) Chain 2: Iteration: 120 / 300 [ 40%] (Warmup) Chain 1: Iteration: 80 / 300 [ 26%] (Warmup) Chain 2: Iteration: 140 / 300 [ 46%] (Warmup) Chain 1: Iteration: 100 / 300 [ 33%] (Warmup) Chain 2: Iteration: 151 / 300 [ 50%] (Sampling) Chain 1: Iteration: 120 / 300 [ 40%] (Warmup) Chain 2: Iteration: 170 / 300 [ 56%] (Sampling) Chain 2: Iteration: 190 / 300 [ 63%] (Sampling) Chain 1: Iteration: 140 / 300 [ 46%] (Warmup) Chain 1: Iteration: 151 / 300 [ 50%] (Sampling) Chain 2: Iteration: 210 / 300 [ 70%] (Sampling) Chain 1: Iteration: 170 / 300 [ 56%] (Sampling) Chain 2: Iteration: 230 / 300 [ 76%] (Sampling) Chain 1: Iteration: 190 / 300 [ 63%] (Sampling) Chain 2: Iteration: 250 / 300 [ 83%] (Sampling) Chain 1: Iteration: 210 / 300 [ 70%] (Sampling) Chain 2: Iteration: 270 / 300 [ 90%] (Sampling) Chain 1: Iteration: 230 / 300 [ 76%] (Sampling) Chain 2: Iteration: 290 / 300 [ 96%] (Sampling) Chain 2: Iteration: 300 / 300 [100%] (Sampling) Chain 2: Chain 2: Elapsed Time: 17.345 seconds (Warm-up) Chain 2: 10.583 seconds (Sampling) Chain 2: 27.928 seconds (Total) Chain 2: Chain 1: Iteration: 250 / 300 [ 83%] (Sampling) Chain 1: Iteration: 270 / 300 [ 90%] (Sampling) Chain 1: Iteration: 290 / 300 [ 96%] (Sampling) Chain 1: Iteration: 300 / 300 [100%] (Sampling) Chain 1: Chain 1: Elapsed Time: 21.462 seconds (Warm-up) Chain 1: 11.582 seconds (Sampling) Chain 1: 33.044 seconds (Total) Chain 1: [ FAIL 0 | WARN 0 | SKIP 0 | PASS 8 ] > > proc.time() user system elapsed 32.23 1.21 91.07