* using log directory ‘/srv/hornik/tmp/CRAN/callback.Rcheck’ * using R Under development (unstable) (2024-04-29 r86495) * using platform: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu * R was compiled by Debian clang version 17.0.6 (5) Debian flang-new version 17.0.6 (5) * running under: Debian GNU/Linux trixie/sid * using session charset: UTF-8 * checking for file ‘callback/DESCRIPTION’ ... OK * checking extension type ... Package * this is package ‘callback’ version ‘0.1.0’ * package encoding: UTF-8 * checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... [3s/3s] NOTE Maintainer: ‘Emmanuel Duguet ’ New submission Possibly misspelled words in DESCRIPTION: Clopper (18:30) The Title field should be in title case. Current version is: ‘Computes statistics from discrimination experimental data’ In title case that is: ‘Computes Statistics from Discrimination Experimental Data’ * checking package namespace information ... OK * checking package dependencies ... OK * checking if this is a source package ... OK * checking if there is a namespace ... OK * checking for executable files ... OK * checking for hidden files and directories ... OK * checking for portable file names ... OK * checking for sufficient/correct file permissions ... OK * checking whether package ‘callback’ can be installed ... [1s/1s] OK * checking package directory ... OK * checking for future file timestamps ... OK * checking ‘build’ directory ... OK * checking DESCRIPTION meta-information ... OK * checking top-level files ... OK * checking for left-over files ... OK * checking index information ... OK * checking package subdirectories ... OK * checking code files for non-ASCII characters ... OK * checking R files for syntax errors ... OK * checking whether the package can be loaded ... [0s/0s] OK * checking whether the package can be loaded with stated dependencies ... [0s/0s] OK * checking whether the package can be unloaded cleanly ... [0s/0s] OK * checking whether the namespace can be loaded with stated dependencies ... [0s/0s] OK * checking whether the namespace can be unloaded cleanly ... [0s/0s] OK * checking loading without being on the library search path ... [0s/0s] OK * checking use of S3 registration ... OK * checking dependencies in R code ... OK * checking S3 generic/method consistency ... OK * checking replacement functions ... OK * checking foreign function calls ... OK * checking R code for possible problems ... [2s/2s] OK * checking Rd files ... [0s/0s] OK * checking Rd metadata ... OK * checking Rd line widths ... OK * checking Rd cross-references ... OK * checking for missing documentation entries ... OK * checking for code/documentation mismatches ... OK * checking Rd \usage sections ... OK * checking Rd contents ... OK * checking for unstated dependencies in examples ... OK * checking contents of ‘data’ directory ... OK * checking data for non-ASCII characters ... [0s/0s] OK * checking LazyData ... OK * checking data for ASCII and uncompressed saves ... OK * checking installed files from ‘inst/doc’ ... OK * checking files in ‘vignettes’ ... OK * checking examples ... [0s/0s] ERROR Running examples in ‘callback-Ex.R’ failed The error most likely occurred in: > base::assign(".ptime", proc.time(), pos = "CheckExEnv") > ### Name: callstat > ### Title: Statistical analysis of callback data > ### Aliases: callstat > > ### ** Examples > > data(inter1) > callstat(inter1,cluster="offer",candid=c("gender","origin"), + callback="callback",comp = "ref", level = 0.90, out.file = 1, + out.name = "study") CALLBACK package ---------------- Data check: The callback variable callback is boolean: TRUE must match non negative callbacks. gender is a factor with reference level Man origin is a factor with reference level F Structure of the experiment --------------------------- Number of tests for each group: Man.F Woman.F Man.M Woman.M Man.S Woman.S Man.V Woman.V 310 310 310 310 310 310 310 310 Percentages: Man.F Woman.F Man.M Woman.M Man.S Woman.S Man.V Woman.V 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 Analysis of counts ------------------- Callback totals (candidate 1 vs candidate 2): tests callbacks candidate 1 candidate 2 difference 1-2 Man.F vs Woman.F 310 113 86 70 16 Man.F vs Man.M 310 106 86 65 21 Man.F vs Woman.M 310 96 86 32 54 Man.F vs Man.S 310 100 86 43 43 Man.F vs Woman.S 310 97 86 26 60 Man.F vs Man.V 310 97 86 38 48 Man.F vs Woman.V 310 111 86 62 24 Callback details: neither only 1 only 2 both Man.F vs Woman.F 197 43 27 43 Man.F vs Man.M 204 41 20 45 Man.F vs Woman.M 214 64 10 22 Man.F vs Man.S 210 57 14 29 Man.F vs Woman.S 213 71 11 15 Man.F vs Man.V 213 59 11 27 Man.F vs Woman.V 199 49 25 37 Analysis of proportions - fractions of tests: --------------------------------------------- At least one callback: tests L90_p_callbacks p_callbacks U90_p_callbacks Man.F vs Woman.F 310 0.319 0.365 0.412 Man.F vs Man.M 310 0.297 0.342 0.389 Man.F vs Woman.M 310 0.266 0.310 0.356 Man.F vs Man.S 310 0.279 0.323 0.369 Man.F vs Woman.S 310 0.269 0.313 0.359 Man.F vs Man.V 310 0.269 0.313 0.359 Man.F vs Woman.V 310 0.313 0.358 0.405 (Clopper-Pearson confidence intervals at the 90 % level) Callback rates of the candidates (cand1 vs cand2): L90_p_cand1 p_cand1 U90_p_cand1 L90_p_cand2 p_cand2 Man.F vs Woman.F 0.236 0.277 0.322 0.1872 0.2258 Man.F vs Man.M 0.236 0.277 0.322 0.1722 0.2097 Man.F vs Woman.M 0.236 0.277 0.322 0.0761 0.1032 Man.F vs Man.S 0.236 0.277 0.322 0.1075 0.1387 Man.F vs Woman.S 0.236 0.277 0.322 0.0594 0.0839 Man.F vs Man.V 0.236 0.277 0.322 0.0931 0.1226 Man.F vs Woman.V 0.236 0.277 0.322 0.1633 0.2000 U90_p_cand2 Man.F vs Woman.F 0.268 Man.F vs Man.M 0.251 Man.F vs Woman.M 0.136 Man.F vs Man.S 0.175 Man.F vs Woman.S 0.114 Man.F vs Man.V 0.158 Man.F vs Woman.V 0.241 (Clopper-Pearson confidence intervals at the 90 % level) Analysis of proportions - fractions of callbacks: ------------------------------------------------- Callback rates of the candidates (cand1 vs cand2): callbacks L90_r_cand1 r_cand_1 U90_r_cand1 L90_r_cand2 Man.F vs Woman.F 113 0.509 0.614 0.712 0.2881 Man.F vs Man.M 106 0.560 0.672 0.771 0.2290 Man.F vs Woman.M 96 0.782 0.865 0.925 0.0752 Man.F vs Man.S 100 0.709 0.803 0.877 0.1233 Man.F vs Woman.S 97 0.788 0.866 0.923 0.0771 Man.F vs Man.V 97 0.753 0.843 0.909 0.0907 Man.F vs Woman.V 111 0.561 0.662 0.753 0.2469 r_cand_2 U90_r_cand2 Man.F vs Woman.F 0.386 0.491 Man.F vs Man.M 0.328 0.440 Man.F vs Woman.M 0.135 0.218 Man.F vs Man.S 0.197 0.291 Man.F vs Woman.S 0.134 0.212 Man.F vs Man.V 0.157 0.247 Man.F vs Woman.V 0.338 0.439 (Clopper-Pearson confidence intervals at the 90 % level) Comparison analysis - fractions of proportions (cand1 vs cand2): ---------------------------------------------------------------- (Asymptotic paired Student test) dif(cand1-cand2) Student p-value Man.F vs Woman.F 0.0516 1.92 0.0557 Man.F vs Man.M 0.0677 2.72 0.00697 Man.F vs Woman.M 0.174 6.71 9.4e-11 Man.F vs Man.S 0.139 5.32 1.96e-07 Man.F vs Woman.S 0.194 7.14 6.7e-12 Man.F vs Man.V 0.155 6.06 3.99e-09 Man.F vs Woman.V 0.0774 2.82 0.0051 Comparison analysis - fractions of callbacks (cand1 vs cand2): -------------------------------------------------------------- (Exact binomial test) r_cand1 r_cand1-0.5 p-value Man.F vs Woman.F 0.614 0.114 7.22e-02 Man.F vs Man.M 0.672 0.172 9.85e-03 Man.F vs Woman.M 0.865 0.365 8.96e-11 Man.F vs Man.S 0.803 0.303 2.67e-07 Man.F vs Woman.S 0.866 0.366 6.81e-12 Man.F vs Man.V 0.843 0.343 4.47e-09 Man.F vs Woman.V 0.662 0.162 7.08e-03 Fisher exact independence test: ------------------------------- ( gender origin x callback ) fisher_p_value Man.F vs Woman.F.p.value 1.649424e-01 Man.F vs Man.M.p.value 6.108741e-02 Man.F vs Woman.M.p.value 3.790180e-08 Man.F vs Man.S.p.value 2.859620e-05 Man.F vs Woman.S.p.value 3.229317e-10 Man.F vs Man.V.p.value 1.886620e-06 Man.F vs Woman.V.p.value 3.004301e-02 Error in utils::write.table(out_comp, file = paste(out.name, "_stat_comp", : unimplemented type 'list' in 'EncodeElement' Calls: callstat ... write.csv -> eval.parent -> eval -> eval -> Execution halted * checking for unstated dependencies in vignettes ... OK * checking package vignettes ... OK * checking re-building of vignette outputs ... [1s/1s] OK * checking PDF version of manual ... [3s/3s] OK * checking HTML version of manual ... [0s/0s] OK * checking for non-standard things in the check directory ... NOTE Found the following files/directories: ‘study_stat_comp.csv’ ‘study_stat_count.csv’ ‘study_stat_prop.csv’ * checking for detritus in the temp directory ... OK * DONE Status: 1 ERROR, 2 NOTEs