R Under development (unstable) (2024-02-02 r85855 ucrt) -- "Unsuffered Consequences" Copyright (C) 2024 The R Foundation for Statistical Computing Platform: x86_64-w64-mingw32/x64 R is free software and comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. You are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions. Type 'license()' or 'licence()' for distribution details. R is a collaborative project with many contributors. Type 'contributors()' for more information and 'citation()' on how to cite R or R packages in publications. Type 'demo()' for some demos, 'help()' for on-line help, or 'help.start()' for an HTML browser interface to help. Type 'q()' to quit R. > # test by William Revelle > # from Jennrich, Psychometrika, 2002, solution for the Thurstone 20 box problem. # Specifying 27 elements to be 0 as discussed in that article (Table 1 at > # page 12) and using vgQ.target as revised or vgQ.pst with a W matrix > # and Target as specified does not yield the reported solution. > # The solution is almost identical for the high loadings but differs slightly > # for the small loadings. The two models have a factor congruence of .99 for > # all three factors, but do not agree completely. > > # Jennrich (2002) apparently was using the oblique rotation option. > # When running TargetQ the results are fine, or when running > # the vgQ.pst function with GPFoblq. > > # This a good test case for both TargetQ > # (It could also be adapted for pst but there is already a test for it.) > > require("GPArotation") Loading required package: GPArotation > data(Thurstone) #the 20 box problem > > #solution reported in Jennrich 2002 > > browne <- t(matrix(c( + 0.013, 0.994, 0.007, + 0.991, 0.012, 0.001, + 0.018, 0.003, 0.986, + 0.772, 0.477, 0.002, + 0.003, 0.393, 0.874, + 0.409, 0.003, 0.816, + 0.548, 0.730, -0.020, + 0.023, 0.870, 0.405, + 0.799, -0.024, 0.453, + 0.664, 0.621, -0.005, + -0.058, 0.915, 0.512, + 0.639, -0.018, 0.644, + 0.046, 0.980, -0.003, + 0.971, -0.038, 0.060, + -0.026, 0.025, 0.965, + 0.380, 0.281, 0.726, + 0.490, 0.652, 0.286, + -0.025, 0.971, 0.019, + 0.957, 0.061, -0.045, + 0.028, 0.000, 0.976), + 3,20,dimnames = list(c("B1", "B2", "B3"), NULL))) > > #a simplified target matrix, with NAs for ? and 0 for 0s. > # (compare to pst appproach) > Target <- t(matrix(c( + 0, NA, 0, + NA, 0, 0, + 0, 0, NA, + NA, NA, 0, + 0, NA, NA, + NA, 0, NA, + NA, NA, 0, + 0, NA, NA, + NA, 0, NA, + NA, NA, 0, + 0, NA, NA, + NA, 0, NA, + 0, NA, 0, + NA, 0, 0, + 0, 0, NA, + NA, NA, NA, + NA, NA, NA, + 0, NA, 0, + NA, 0, 0, + 0, 0, NA), + 3, 20, dimnames = list(c("T1", "T2", "T3"), NULL))) > > v <- targetQ(box20,Target=Target)$loadings > # THIS ONE WORKS > #v <- GPFoblq(box20, method ="target", methodArgs = list(Target=Target))$loadings > > all.ok <- TRUE > > #slightly larger fuzz for comparison with published value. > # note max(abs(v) - abs(browne))rather than max(abs(v - browne)) > # as sign change is possible > if( 10e-4 < max(abs(v) - abs(browne))) { + cat("Calculated value is not the same as test value in Jennrich2002. Value:\n") + print(v, digits=18) + cat("difference:\n") + print(v - browne, digits=18) + all.ok <- FALSE + } > > good <- t(matrix(c( + 0.01324194563970146343, -0.99360765277094842407, 0.007265459960371034587, + 0.99121314541487770544, -0.01178320700232154961, 0.000654586020267855506, + 0.01798447315534307256, -0.00266076852016330911, 0.985581004768931734361, + 0.77198435084052174915, -0.47723548341238952730, 0.001547735983967568618, + 0.00334198654247502835, -0.39290416948063611180, 0.874043793719835537814, + 0.40934347835281348349, -0.00274610551094590233, 0.815649888720176186041, + 0.54757055519984310088, -0.72951044925148011977, -0.020211353947714422175, + 0.02292379053779741716, -0.87011712730189194609, 0.404542252780873523577, + 0.79911058029224457666, 0.02416810475294199623, 0.452727043944761764482, + 0.66393502364020362538, -0.62149665012300570055, -0.005186928343372421146, + -0.05839790682548451350, -0.91517931889838155524, 0.511521949806932663130, + 0.63924406199386740735, 0.01841750353525576159, 0.643544196342115570886, + 0.04597086497418309547, -0.97980801598321454193, -0.002918643110053173451, + 0.97103389549392915558, 0.03847065084578840666, 0.060066450372699808913, + -0.02622776344285615568, -0.02482060086975104718, 0.965272709232911085842, + 0.37998105522582992233, -0.28073835673932595602, 0.726047993725112084107, + 0.48985182554738604388, -0.65226812910595410866, 0.285738966726349907788, + -0.02451057644240206557, -0.97122042802717223342, 0.019132901654980147277, + 0.95708220223038309449, -0.06086293722346142188, -0.045050942196376064786, + 0.02797903728304645954, 0.00036458752733534161, 0.976083771686937051726), + 3,20,dimnames = list(c("B1", "B2", "B3"), NULL))) > > #tighter fuzz for numerical comparison with previous test value > if( 10e-12 < max(abs(v - good))) { + cat("Calculated value is not the same as previous test value. Value:\n") + print(v, digits=18) + cat("difference:\n") + print(v - good, digits=18) + all.ok <- FALSE + } > > > cat("tests completed.\n") tests completed. > > > if (! all.ok) stop("some tests FAILED") > > proc.time() user system elapsed 0.14 0.04 0.18